[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15291.1241478051@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:00:51 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: paul@...-scientist.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" tryingtoifenslave a second interface to my bond
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:03:37 -0700
>
>> Paul Smith <paul@...-scientist.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Jay/David/etc.;
>>>
>>>This patch is critical for me to properly use mode 6 (balance-alb)
>>>bonding; I assume it will be needed for others as well. I haven't
>>>checked to see if it's still necessary in 2.6.29/2.6.30, but I didn't
>>>notice it going into the latest 2.6.27.22, released today.
>>>
>>>Is this still unofficial? Is there an official patch on the horizon?
>>
>> David, please apply and queue for -stable:
>
>Greg just posted that there will be no further 2.6.27.x -stable
>releases after the one he just made.
Regardless of the -stable situation, the patch is still needed
for the current mainline (sorry if that wasn't clear). I checked it
against the current net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 trees, and it should apply
to either one.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists