netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa686aa40905061539t4fa463aehe56fdb64d053135d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2009 16:39:25 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Cc:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	John Rigby <jrigby@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>, Detlev Zundel <dzu@...x.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de> wrote:
> Dear Scott,
>
> in message <4A01F602.2010601@...escale.com> you wrote:
>>
>> All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in
>> asm/cpm.h.  Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and
>
> OK, I can try to reuse the definitions from that file.
>
>> 512x are enabled in the same kernel?
>
> Hm... both architectures look sufficiently different to me that I
> don't see sense in trying such a thing. Do you think that needs to be
> supported?

Yes!  :-)  It's not hard to do and it keeps the driver cleaner
(IMNSHO).  I don't think it is quite possible at the moment due to
cache coherency issues, but with Becky's recently merged dma ops
changes it should be fixable.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html