lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2009 06:10:10 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <>
To:	Vladimir Ivashchenko <>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <>,
Subject: Re: bond + tc regression ?

On 05-05-2009 19:41, Vladimir Ivashchenko wrote:
>>> On both kernels, the system is running with at least 70% idle CPU.
>>> The network interrupts are distributed accross the cores.
>> You should not distribute interrupts, but bound a NIC to one CPU
> Kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 do this by default, so I thought its correct.
> The defaults are wrong?
>> ifconfig -a
> bond0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1B:24:BD:E9:CC
>           inet  Mask:
>           inet6 addr: fe80::21b:24ff:febd:e9cc/64 Scope:Link
>           RX packets:436076190 errors:0 dropped:391250 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2620156321 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:4210046233 (3.9 GiB)  TX bytes:2520272242 (2.3 GiB)

Could you try e.g.: ifconfig bond0 txqueuelen 1000
before tc qdisc add?

Jarek P.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists