[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40905061542g2cf538bau5eebcfc154906810@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:42:55 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, John Rigby <jrigby@...escale.com>,
Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
John Rigby <jcrigby@...il.com>, Detlev Zundel <dzu@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] fs_enet: Add FEC TX Alignment workaround for
MPC5121.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de> wrote:
> Dear Grant Likely,
>
> In message <fa686aa40905061337w6aa82f5aj787618ba108e528f@...l.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> > The FEC on 5121 has problems with misaligned tx buffers.
>> > The RM says any alignment is ok but empirical results
>> > show that packet buffers ending in 0x1E will sometimes
>> > hang the FEC. Other bad alignment does not hang but will
>> > cause silent TX failures resulting in about a 1% packet
>> > loss as tested by ping -f from a remote host.
>> >
>> > This patch is a work around that copies every tx packet
>> > to an aligned skb before sending.
>>
>> OUCH!
>
> Yes :-(
>
>> > +#else
>> > +#define tx_skb_align_workaround(dev, skb) (skb)
>> > +#endif
>>
>> Another use of #ifdef blocks. What is the multiplatform impact?
>
> Hm... Can you recommend a better way to solve the problem? Suggestions
> are welcome.
I'd rather see a runtime selectable workaround. ie. enable it based
on the compatible property.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists