[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1241611472.30581.10.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:04:32 +0300
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Stanislaw Gruszka" <sgruszka@...hat.com>
cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bnx2x: assure we release PHY lock only when is
taken
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 02:22 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
> index ff2d9f6..5bd42db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
> @@ -2585,10 +2585,11 @@ static void bnx2x_attn_int_asserted(struct bnx2x *bp, u32 asserted)
> REG_WR(bp, hc_addr, asserted);
>
> /* now set back the mask */
> - if (asserted & ATTN_NIG_FOR_FUNC) {
> - REG_WR(bp, nig_int_mask_addr, nig_mask);
> - bnx2x_release_phy_lock(bp);
> - }
> + if (asserted & ATTN_HARD_WIRED_MASK)
> + if (asserted & ATTN_NIG_FOR_FUNC) {
Here are the constants values:
#define ATTN_HARD_WIRED_MASK 0xff00
#define ATTN_NIG_FOR_FUNC (1L << 8)
So as you can see, there is no need for the extra "if".
Thanks for the patch - but we should not apply it.
> + REG_WR(bp, nig_int_mask_addr, nig_mask);
> + bnx2x_release_phy_lock(bp);
> + }
> }
>
> static inline void bnx2x_attn_int_deasserted0(struct bnx2x *bp, u32 attn)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists