netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: update skb_recycle_check() for hardware timestamping changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1241615499.26936.25.camel@pohly-MOBL>
Date:	Wed, 06 May 2009 15:11:39 +0200
From:	Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
To:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Cc:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: update skb_recycle_check() for hardware
 timestamping changes

On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:13 +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Commit ac45f602ee3d1b6f326f68bc0c2591ceebf05ba4 ("net: infrastructure
> for hardware time stamping") added two skb initialization actions to
> __alloc_skb(), which need to be added to skb_recycle_check() as well.

Good catch, thanks. For what it's worth:

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html