netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090506220954.5D3AF83420E8@gemini.denx.de>
Date:	Thu, 07 May 2009 00:09:54 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	Detlev Zundel <dzu@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

Dear Scott,

in message <4A01F602.2010601@...escale.com> you wrote:
>
> All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in 
> asm/cpm.h.  Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and 

OK, I can try to reuse the definitions from that file.

> 512x are enabled in the same kernel?

Hm... both architectures look sufficiently different to me that I
don't see sense in trying such a thing. Do you think that needs to be
supported?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@...x.de
"You ain't experienced..." "Well, nor are you." "That's true. But the
point is ... the point is ... the point is we've been not experienced
for a lot longer than you. We've got  a  lot  of  experience  of  not
having any experience."           - Terry Pratchett, _Witches Abroad_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html