[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <983C93C9-4AA8-421B-B7F8-770E2FD672E1@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:05:02 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>, Detlev Zundel <dzu@...x.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
John Rigby <jrigby@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.
On May 6, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Grant,
>
> in message <fa686aa40905061333q29c263c8p24856c048e30f4d0@...l.gmail.com
> > you wrote:
>>
> ...
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENET_HAS_FEC
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENET_MPC5121_FEC
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-fec",
>>> + .data = (void *)&fs_fec_ops,
>>> + },
>>> +#else
>>> {
>>> .compatible = "fsl,pq1-fec-enet",
>>> .data = (void *)&fs_fec_ops,
>>> },
>>> #endif
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Hmmm. A lot of these #ifdefs in here. Does this have a
>> multiplatform
>> impact? Not to mention the fact that it's just plain ugly. :-)
>
> Agreed that it's ugly, but duplicatio9ng the code would have been even
> worse. I don't think that it has multiplatform - at least not as long
> as you don't ask for one image that runs on 83xx and on 512x.
We do ask for that. The fedora ppc6xx kernel should work on any 6xx/
7xx/7xxx based core chip. We should NOT be breaking such capability
in drivers.
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists