[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090507.145931.179746218.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 14:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yanghy@...fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]ipv6:use ipv6_addr_type instead of __ipv6_addr_type
From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:47:38 +0800
> Although the function of these two functions are the same,we should use the
> encapsulation function of __ipv6_addr_type
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang<yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
Are you sure? ipv6_addr_type() masks out the upper 16-bits
of __ipv6_addr_type()'s return value, which is the scope.
I'm not convinced that is what we want to do here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists