[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A03EAC3.1010601@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 16:18:11 +0800
From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]ipv6:use ipv6_addr_type instead of __ipv6_addr_type
David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 09:18:11 +0800
>>
>>> David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:47:38 +0800
>>>>
>>>>> Although the function of these two functions are the same,we should use the
>>>>> encapsulation function of __ipv6_addr_type
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang<yanghy@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> Are you sure? ipv6_addr_type() masks out the upper 16-bits
>>>> of __ipv6_addr_type()'s return value, which is the scope.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not convinced that is what we want to do here.
>>> My advice here is that the function which has __ maybe shouldn't be directly used.
>
> I also want to address this statement on it's own, it's simply
> not true.
>
> "__" means "think carefully before using this function", or "this
> function requires a special environment for proper usage"
>
> It DOES NOT mean "do not use directly." It's never meant this.
I was wrong,thank you for your patience to explain this.
>
> So ever basis for your patch is fundamentally flawed.
>
>
--
Regards
Yang Hongyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists