netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: introduce a list of device addresses dev_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090508.162555.193731410.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 08 May 2009 16:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shemminger@...tta.com
Cc:	jpirko@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	fubar@...ibm.com, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	kaber@...sh.net, mschmidt@...hat.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
	ivecera@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce a list of device addresses
 dev_addr_list (v6)

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:12:04 -0700

> But the other infrastructure may have same issues (netfilter, etc).
> Just seems like it would be either to have multiple network devices
> so that upper layers could disambiguate easier.

That's quite a heavyweight solution to what is purely
an addressing issue, don't you think?

We can just revert all of that netdev_ops stuff if you
think per-netdev cost doesn't matter :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html