[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512081119.598b22c5@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:11:19 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: ports beeing reused too fast
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:32:57 +0300
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >> Any strong reason why a firewall would drop a SYN because ports were
> > > > >> used in a previous session ?
> > > > >
> > > > > We don't know why the firewall (Cisco FWSM) is dropping the packets,
> > > > > may be a bug, limitation or miss-configuration. We are trying to
> > > > > track this down with the firewall vendor.
> > > >
>
> Interestingly, we are seeing the same behavior with another high-end firewall
> (Juniper SRX).
>
> As mentioned previously, this can not be caused by the TW state, because the
> connections are getting closed on the server side.
>
> Thanks,
> tavi
I raised the issue to the original author of the proposed RFC and added
the issue to the ongoing review of the draft.
There is a suggested workaround using a bitmap but it seems like it would be
expensive to implement:
http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-ananth-tsvwg-timewait-00.txt
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists