[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242178490.11389.20.camel@merlyn>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:34:50 -0500
From: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: tcp_prequeue() can use keyed wakeups
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:20 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We can avoid waking up tasks not interested in receive notifications,
> using wake_up_interruptible_poll() instead of wake_up_interruptible()
Is there any reason why we shouldn't do the same thing on the write
side?
Compile-tested only.
-- John
---
[PATCH net-next-2.6] tcp: Don't wake up reading threads on write space
When TCP frees up write buffer space, avoid waking up tasks that have
done a poll() or select() on the same socket specifying read-side
events.
This is an extension of a read-side patch by Eric Dumazet.
Signed-off-by: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
---
net/core/stream.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/stream.c b/net/core/stream.c
index 8727cea..a37debf 100644
--- a/net/core/stream.c
+++ b/net/core/stream.c
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ void sk_stream_write_space(struct sock *sk)
clear_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))
- wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
+ wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT |
+ POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);
if (sock->fasync_list && !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN))
sock_wake_async(sock, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
--
1.5.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists