[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1eiusp4jc.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 23:44:23 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] syscall: Implement a convinience function restart_syscall
Currently when we have a signal pending we have the functionality
to restart that the current system call. There are other cases
such as nasty lock ordering issues where it makes sense to have
a simple fix that uses try lock and restarts the system call.
Buying time to figure out how to rework the locking strategy.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4c38bc..d853f6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2178,6 +2178,12 @@ static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
return unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_NEED_RESCHED));
}
+static inline int restart_syscall(void)
+{
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SIGPENDING);
+ return -ERESTARTNOINTR;
+}
+
static inline int signal_pending(struct task_struct *p)
{
return unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(p,TIF_SIGPENDING));
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists