lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 10:31:58 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> To: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz Subject: Re: HTB accuracy for high speed On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 03:49:31PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote: > Hi! > I've been using HTB in a Linux bridge and recently I noticed that, for > high speed, the configured rate/ceil is not respected as for lower > speeds. > I'm using a packet generator/analyser to inject over 950Mpbs, and see > what returns back to it, in the other side of my bridge. Generated > packets have 800bytes. I noticed that, for several tc HTB rate/ceil > configurations the amount of traffic received by the analyser stays > the same. See this values: > > HTB conf Analyser reception > 476000Kbit 544.260.329 ... > As you can see, class htb 1:108 rate's is 653124Kbit! Much bigger that > it's ceil. Is it for sure there is no gso/tso enabled on this dev (with up to date ethtool -k)? It would be nice to see also more details like .config, ifconfigs before and after the test, tc -s qdisc and bytes/ packet number seen by this analyser, plus maybe some proof you can obtain such flows with something simpler like tbf. Of course using the current kernel, even if no difference, would give us more valuable perspective. Thanks, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists