netdev - Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090516083158.GA3013@ami.dom.local>
Date:	Sat, 16 May 2009 10:31:58 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net,
	devik@....cz
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 03:49:31PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
> Hi!
> I've been using HTB in a Linux bridge and recently I noticed that, for
> high speed, the configured rate/ceil is not respected as for lower
> speeds.
> I'm using a packet generator/analyser to inject over 950Mpbs, and see
> what returns back to it, in the other side of my bridge. Generated
> packets have 800bytes. I noticed that, for several tc HTB rate/ceil
> configurations the amount of traffic received by the analyser stays
> the same. See this values:
> 
> HTB conf      Analyser reception
> 476000Kbit    544.260.329
...
> As you can see, class htb 1:108 rate's is 653124Kbit! Much bigger that
> it's ceil.

Is it for sure there is no gso/tso enabled on this dev (with up to
date ethtool -k)? It would be nice to see also more details like
.config, ifconfigs before and after the test, tc -s qdisc and bytes/
packet number seen by this analyser, plus maybe some proof you can
obtain such flows with something simpler like tbf. Of course using
the current kernel, even if no difference, would give us more
valuable perspective.

Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html