[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1027C3.3080109@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:05:39 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>, dlaor@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dor Laor <dor@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 03:57:01 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> +static void adjust_threshold(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>>> + unsigned int out, unsigned int in)
>>> +{
>>> + /* There are really two species of virtqueue, and it matters here.
>>> + * If there are no output parts, it's a "normally full" receive queue,
>>> + * otherwise it's a "normally empty" send queue. */
>>>
>> This comment is true for networking, but not for block. ++overkill with
>> a ->adjust_threshold op.
>>
>
> No, it's true for block. It has output parts, so we should reduce threshold
> when it's full. Network recvq is an example which should reduce threshold
> when it's empty.
>
You mean the header that contains the sector number? It's a little
incidental, but I guess it works.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists