[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518111411.GB11162@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:14:11 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net,
devik@....cz
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:39:02AM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here the information you asked:
Very nice, but there are some questions:
- if this analyser uses tcp we definitely need tso off as well during
these tests,
- it would be nice to use two patches I've sent to exclude known (now)
reasons.
With the above I expect accuracy should be better, but definitely not
like hfsc (plus no higher than 1000Mbit rate reported after stopping
effect).
Thanks,
Jarek P.
>
> # ethtool -k eth0
> Offload parameters for eth0:
> rx-checksumming: on
> tx-checksumming: on
> scatter-gather: on
> tcp segmentation offload: on
> udp fragmentation offload: off
> generic segmentation offload: off
>
> # ethtool -k eth1
> Offload parameters for eth1:
> rx-checksumming: on
> tx-checksumming: on
> scatter-gather: on
> tcp segmentation offload: on
> udp fragmentation offload: off
> generic segmentation offload: off
>
> The bridge is between eth0 and eth1
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists