netdev - Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <298f5c050905181103g3365ddd0g8d398c258c4df382@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 19:03:55 +0100
From:	Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jarkao2@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net,
	davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

I have my kernel's timer frequency set to 1000Hz since the beginning.
I've got all these results with HZ_1000.

(I'm working on clocksource)

Thanks
  Antonio Almeida


On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:01:21 +0100
> Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
>> returns "jiffies"
>
> That is the slowest of the choices. Better ones are hpet and tsc, but you
> hardware doesn't support them.
>
> You should compile your kernel with HZ=1000 and the resolution will be better
> (but with some loss of performance).
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html