[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090518.194013.109631461.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: orphan skbs if we're relying on timer to free
them
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:18:47 +0930
> We check for finished xmit skbs on every xmit, or on a timer (unless
> the host promises to force an interrupt when the xmit ring is empty).
> This can penalize userspace tasks which fill their sockbuf. Not much
> difference with TSO, but measurable with large numbers of packets.
>
> There are a finite number of packets which can be in the transmission
> queue. We could fire the timer more than every 100ms, but that would
> just hurt performance for a corner case. This seems neatest.
...
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
If this is so great for virtio it would also be a great idea
universally, but we don't do it.
What you're doing by orphan'ing is creating a situation where a single
UDP socket can loop doing sends and monopolize the TX queue of a
device. The only control we have over a sender for fairness in
datagram protocols is that send buffer allocation.
I'm guilty of doing this too in the NIU driver, also because there I
lack a "TX queue empty" interrupt and this can keep TCP sockets from
getting stuck.
I think we need a generic solution to this issue because it is getting
quite common to see cases where the packets in the TX queue of a
device can sit there indefinitely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists