[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1octpplci.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:07:09 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
shemminger@...tta.com, greearb@...delatech.com, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IPv4/IPv6 unregistration deadlock fixes
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 19:53:40 -0700
>
>> A while ago it was noticed that unregistering network devices could cause
>> deadlocks if virtual files that take the rtnl_lock were accessed at the
>> wrong time.
>>
>> After looking at the different possibilities the only way to solve it
>> cleanly without some kind of busy loop appears to be reducing the scope
>> of the rtnl lock.
>>
>> I have not tackled the hard fix yet but I have tested our current work
>> around and it does not succeed in restarting the system call and
>> instead leaks -ERESTARNOSYS to userspace, because we do not have a
>> signal pending.
>>
>> Further the current work around misses several interesting places
>> in the network stack where the deadlock can occur.
>>
>> I have addressed the problems by making a common helper function
>> and patching all of the places I could find that had this problem.
>
> I've added these changes to net-next-2.6, thanks.
>
> I really can't justify sticking this into net-2.6, especially
> this late in the series, sorry.
No problem. The problem is ancient. I just figured it was time to
start solving it.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists