[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090519123417.GA7376@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:34:17 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: lav@....ru
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 13339] New: rtable leak in ipv4/route.c
On 19-05-2009 04:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:10:20 GMT
> From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
> To: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
> Subject: [Bug 13339] New: rtable leak in ipv4/route.c
>
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13339
...
> 2.6.29 patch has introduced flexible route cache rebuilding. Unfortunately the
> patch has at least one critical flaw, and another problem.
>
> rt_intern_hash calculates rthi pointer, which is later used for new entry
> insertion. The same loop calculates cand pointer which is used to clean the
> list. If the pointers are the same, rtable leak occurs, as first the cand is
> removed then the new entry is appended to it.
>
> This leak leads to unregister_netdevice problem (usage count > 0).
>
> Another problem of the patch is that it tries to insert the entries in certain
> order, to facilitate counting of entries distinct by all but QoS parameters.
> Unfortunately, referencing an existing rtable entry moves it to list beginning,
> to speed up further lookups, so the carefully built order is destroyed.
>
> For the first problem the simplest patch it to set rthi=0 when rthi==cand, but
> it will also destroy the ordering.
I think fixing this bug fast is more important than this
ordering or counting. Could you send your patch proposal?
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists