[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090519173503.GD2691@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:35:03 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bc47xx : export ssb_watchdog_timer_set
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 May 2009 19:09:57 Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Maybe because I felt drivers/ssb/ was outside my jurisdiction - and unlike
> > what alot of people may seem to think I'm not a full time MIPS kernel
> > hacker.
>
> Ok nice.
>
> > I can deal with SSB patch if you so desire - but I have no experience with
> > SSB, so I'd have somebody to rubberstamp non-trivial SSB patches before I
> > queue them up.
>
> **Fwoo..
> [stamp here]
> ..mppp**
>
>
> Done. :)
>
> > I can keep them either in the usual MIPS trees on
> > linux-mips.org or I could create a separate linux-ssb tree, depending on
> > what seems to be sensible. Also, reading the entry in the maintainers
> > file I wonder if netdev is really the list of a choice?
>
> Yes it is, because the bus is only used on networking devices.
> (Ethernet cards, wireless cards, and network routers)
> I don't think you need to create a separate tree. ssb is pretty mature. There
> won't be that many patches.
OK, now I'm confused again -- should I take SSB patches, or is Ralf
going to do it? :-)
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists