[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090521082805.GB2892@ami.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:28:05 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz,
Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>,
Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@...ooh.org>
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:44:00AM +0300, Vladimir Ivashchenko wrote:
> > I don't know why more of esfq wasn't merged, anyway similar
> > functionality could be achieved in current kernels with sch_drr +
> > cls_flow, alas not enough documented. Here is some hint:
> > http://markmail.org/message/h24627xkrxyqxn4k
>
> Can I balance only by destination IP using this approach?
> Normal IP flow-based balancing is not good for me, I need
> to ensure equality between destination hosts.
Yes, you need to use flow "dst" key, I guess. (tc filter add flow help)
Jarek P.
> > PS: I guess, you wasn't very consistent if your main problem was
> > exceeding or not reaching htb rate, and there is quite a difference.
>
> Yes indeed :(
Generally, the most common reasons are:
- too short (or zero) tx queue length or/plus some disturbances in
maintaining the flow - for not reaching the rate
- gso/tso or other non standard packets sizes - for exceeding the
rate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists