[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090523073201.GA2766@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:32:01 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > I still have no clue about the reason, but it would be really nice to
> > do some short test with more current kernel (>= 2.6.27) and iproute2
> > (to exclude the possibility of some incomaptibility in configs e.g.
> > rate tables passed to htb).
>
> I installed kernel 2.6.29 (finaly! wasn't easy... I couldn't set
> memory split 2G/2G),
> but the results are the same. I've already applied gen_estimator.c
> patches (works fine).
...
> I'm working on a newer iproute2.
Actually, from these two I was more interested in iproute2 more
fitting the kernel version. :-((It should be enough to have at least
tc compiled properly, I guess.)
Btw.: if at any point you think this testing is too disturbing to you
etc., feel free to stop this or delay in time as you like.
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists