[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905231644.13326.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:44:12 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>,
Michael Büker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
On Saturday 23 May 2009 16:35:28 Michael Riepe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot, Dave! This fixes the issue on my chip.
>
> Yep, it's stable here as well. And even a little faster than pci=nomsi.
> The only strangeness I observed is that the throughput (measured with
> iperf and a single TCP connection) varies:
>
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 667 MBytes 559 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 10.0-20.0 sec 803 MBytes 673 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 20.0-30.0 sec 802 MBytes 673 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 30.0-40.0 sec 714 MBytes 599 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 40.0-50.0 sec 669 MBytes 561 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 50.0-60.0 sec 791 MBytes 663 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 4.34 GBytes 622 Mbits/sec
Are you running the iperf server or client on the r8169?
I'm running the iperf server on the r8169 and get the following results:
mb@...er:~$ iperf -c 192.168.2.50 -t120 -i10
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.2.50, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.2.205 port 34739 connected with 192.168.2.50 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 789 MBytes 662 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 10.0-20.0 sec 791 MBytes 664 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 20.0-30.0 sec 799 MBytes 670 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 30.0-40.0 sec 794 MBytes 666 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 40.0-50.0 sec 795 MBytes 667 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 50.0-60.0 sec 793 MBytes 665 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 60.0-70.0 sec 800 MBytes 671 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 70.0-80.0 sec 795 MBytes 667 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 80.0-90.0 sec 800 MBytes 672 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 90.0-100.0 sec 797 MBytes 669 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 100.0-110.0 sec 789 MBytes 662 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 110.0-120.0 sec 791 MBytes 663 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 0.0-120.0 sec 9.31 GBytes 666 Mbits/sec
Looks acceptable to me.
The iperf client device is a BCM5780.
--
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists