[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AB6488BF71876F4498928F5DDA52616883103F@ITCGCL02BE.fsoft.fpt.vn>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:57:48 +0700
From: "Nguyen Tuan Huy \(G11\)" <huynt1@...ft.com.vn>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [TSO]-Refer to "State of TCP segmentation offload to NIC in linux"
Thanks Ben.
>I think you won't see 64K packets for a TCP connection that was just
>opened, due to the slow start algorithm.
I have dumped the packets that passed to the hardware. I found that
these packets are always MTU size.
I think that it must have one flag indicate that when it is turn on,
packet will not framed by TCP/IP layer, but hardware.
At first I think that is NETIF_F_TSO, but it is not correct.
My kernel version is 2.6.11.12
Best regards,
Huy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@...adent.org.uk]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:16 PM
To: Nguyen Tuan Huy (G11)
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TSO]-Refer to "State of TCP segmentation offload to NIC in
linux"
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 18:38 +0700, Nguyen Tuan Huy (G11) wrote:
> Dear Mr Ben Hutchings,
>
>
>
> I have read your answer about question "State of TCP segmentation
> offload to NIC in linux".
>
> The link is
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/5/7/1757954/thread
Please direct your queries to the netdev list, not to me personally.
> I am now writing network device driver that support TSO function. But
> when I send one packet with 64K, then TCP has divided 64K, not passed
> the whole 64K to NIC driver.
[...]
I think you won't see 64K packets for a TCP connection that was just
opened, due to the slow start algorithm.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists