[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905271158.57067.florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:58:55 +0200
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
slapin@...fans.org, maxim.osipov@...mens.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@...mens.com, oliver.fendt@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][WIP] IEEE 802.15.4 implementation for Linux
Hi Dmitry,
Le Tuesday 26 May 2009 13:21:57 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As a part of research activities in the Embedded Systems - Open Platform
> Group from Siemens Corporate Technology we are working on adding support
> for the IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Personal Area Networks to the Linux. Our
> current implementation is neither certified nor even feature complete.
> However we'd like to present current state of our patchset to the Linux
> developers community to gain comments, fixes, ideas, etc. This is not yet a
> pull request, but more like an RFC.
Let met just thank you for doing this, I am glad some people worked on this.
Got a couple of questions below.
>
> The project page is available at
> http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/linux-zigbee with source code of kernel
> part available from git at
> http://zigbee-linux.git.sourceforge.net, mirrored for convenience at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lumag/lowpan.git
>
> The source code for userspace utils is available from git at
> http://linux-zigbee.git.sourceforge.net/
>From the project page I understand that you plan on providing a ZigBee stack,
based on this 802.15.4 stack ? Do you plan on submitting the ZigBee stack
later on ?
Maybe you should mention that this implementation is royalty-free, but that
commercial products using it should both respect the GPL license and pay a
ZigBee royalty as per the ZigBee Alliance . That is just for clarification
since right now it simply does 802.15.4 which is not subject to this royalty
thing.
>
> Several comments about our implementation:
> * As with 802.11 there are two types of devices: the smart ones that
> implement most parts of the protocol by themselves and more or less dumb
> ones which simply send and receive what they are told. Currently we do only
> support the second type of devices (SoftMAC)
> * The implementation is split between code driving radio, (master, mwpanX
> interface: mdev.c), code processing frames according the IEEE 802.15.4
> rules (slave wpanX devices) and finally sockets (af_ieee802154.c,
> dgram.c, raw.c).
This sounds good. Do you also plan on integrating some meshing algorithm on
top of 802.15.4 ? If so,
> * We do present two example drivers using our stack. One is purely virtual
> one either looping the packets back or connecting several virtual
> interfaces (the one at fakelb.c), and the driver for the Freescale MC13192
> evaluation boards (13192-SARD, 13192-EVK) using our custom firmware
> (currently only available at request, we are working on publishing it). The
> driver for the Atmel at86rf230/at86rf231 chips will follow in several
> weeks.
Is the virtual interface just like mac80211_hwsim for 802.11 ?h
--
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email : florian@...nwrt.org
http://openwrt.org
-------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists