[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <298f5c050905281113o10393c61ye3c0539d2b6efa20@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:13:40 +0100
From: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Actually, from these two I was more interested in iproute2 more
> fitting the kernel version. :-((It should be enough to have at least
> tc compiled properly, I guess.)
I installed iproute2-ss090115 with the new patch but the results are
the same for my test scenery. HTB keeps sending 620Mbit/s when I
configure it's ceil to 555Mbit/s, with 800 bytes packets long.
> Btw.: if at any point you think this testing is too disturbing to you
> etc., feel free to stop this or delay in time as you like.
I'm working on this, don't worry. Since I have a traffic
generator/analyser, any modification you would make I can test it.
You're free to ask.
I've been looking inside htb source code. The granularity problem
could be in the use qdisc_rate_table or near that.
Antonio Almeida
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists