[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090529.154534.37038134.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vapier.adi@...il.com
Cc: Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 1/5] netdev: bfin_mac: Blackfin
EMAC interrupt may not be shared
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:21:41 -0400
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 18:18, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>>> the difference is that one of these is required in order for anything
>>> to get done and the other is always useless noise. also, the Blackfin
>>> core does do speculative data fetching on external memory, but not
>>> MMRs, so the stalling due to the data cache line fills will be
>>> mitigated unlike the useless MMR reads.
>>
>> You only need to read the register if the descriptor status is not
>> ready yet, and you're just spinning in that case anyways.
>>
>> I doubt it makes any real difference if implemented properly.
>>
>> But I guess it's more fun to speculate than to actually try it out.
>> :-/
>
> and i guess it's more fun to waste time attempting to support an
> operating mode that the hardware has never and most likely will never
> support
I guess I'll apply your patch :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists