[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b10243b50905301538o2716855ag21fbc95b37c8da22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:38:51 +0900
From: Minoru Usui <mi.usui@...il.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Minoru Usui <usui@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] net_cls: Panic occured when net_cls subsystem use
Hi, jarek
2009/5/30 Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:31:37AM -0400, jamal wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 15:20 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> > Yes it oopses in cls_cgroup_classify(). Here is the first report:
>> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/128593
>> >
>>
>> Oopsing in classify is after the fact though. It should not have been
>> linked to begin with (because wrong config was passed from user space).
>> As far as cls_group is concerned that is an illegitimate config - thats
>> why it failed it.
>>
>> What were you suggesting to change in cls_group to avoid this oops?
>
> I think checking the head (tp->root) for NULL like in cls_fw or
> cls_route should work.
I agree.
I think cls_cgroup should check head(tp->root) whether NULL or not
like other classifiers, too.
But I think it's problem adding/linking unconfigured tp, too.
>>
>> > We add/link unconfigured tp, but it could be destroyed later, so I
>> > wouldn't call this a memory leak.
>>
>> Indeed - call it "We add/link unconfigured tp".
>
> Anyway, it's worked for other classifiers like this for some time...
I'm sorry, I don't investigate well, so I don't understand where
unconfigured tp is destroyed, yet.
If you don't mind, could you tell me where it's destoryed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists