netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] virtio_net: don't free buffers in xmit ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:41:42 +0100
From:	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] virtio_net: don't free buffers in xmit ring

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:13 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 23:46 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > The virtio_net driver is complicated by the two methods of freeing old
> > xmit buffers (in addition to freeing old ones at the start of the xmit
> > path).
> > 
> > The original code used a 1/10 second timer attached to xmit_free(),
> > reset on every xmit.  Before we orphaned skbs on xmit, the
> > transmitting userspace could block with a full socket until the timer
> > fired, the skb destructor was called, and they were re-woken.
> 
> The timer was actually added to solve a hang when trying to unload
> nf_conntrack AFAIR - nf_conntrack was blocking on the skb being freed
> and we never actually freed it.
> 
> I think skb_orphan() is enough to prevent this, is it?

Oops, I meant:

  I don't think skb_orphan() is enough to prevent this, is it?

Cheers,
Mark.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html