[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A24B920.2010605@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:31:12 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4/ipv6: check hop limit field on input
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:13:43 +0200
>
>> RFC indicates that a router must drop the packet if this field is 0.
>
> It only must do this when executing the forwarding function. It's an
> egress check, not an ingress one.
>
> I'm not applying this patch, it can even break some applications
> out there that use a TTL of zero intentionally to keep traffic
> only on a local subnet.
I wonder if we then should allow setting ttl to zero. I had to patch
my kernel to allow ping to do this...
I'll check RFC when time permits.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index e2d1f87..efe2797 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
case IP_TTL:
if (optlen<1)
goto e_inval;
- if (val != -1 && (val < 1 || val>255))
+ if (val != -1 && (val < 0 || val>255))
goto e_inval;
inet->uc_ttl = val;
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists