[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090602130857.GA7690@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:08:58 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:45:34PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Almeida wrote:
>>>> I'm getting great values with this patch!
>>>> ...
>>>> I'll get back to you with more values.
>>> The steps are much smaller and the error keeps lower than 1%.
>>> Injecting over 950Mpbs of tcp packets of 800bytes I get these values:
>>
>> Nice values - should be acceptable, I guess. Alas this is not all, and
>> I'll ask you soon for re-testing HFSC (after another patch) or maybe
>> even some simple CBQ setup ;-)
>
> I didn't follow the full discussion, so I'm not sure which kind of
> arithmetic error you're attempting to cure. For the HFSC scaling
> factors, please just keep in mind that its also supposed to be
> very accurate at low bandwidths.
It's all here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/129301
Of course, I'd appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists