netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090603102747.GD5644@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:27:47 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, devik@....cz,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:06:10PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> PSCHED_SHIFT should be 4, right?
>>
>>> -#define    SM_SHIFT    20
>>> -#define    ISM_SHIFT    18
>>> +#define    PSCHED_SHIFT    6    /* TODO: move to pkt_sched.h */
>>> +#define    SM_SHIFT    (30 - PSCHED_SHIFT)
>>> +#define    ISM_SHIFT    (8 + PSCHED_SHIFT)
>>
>> Actually I'm confused, why the additional change of 10?
>
> OK, 10 - 6 = 4, got it :)
>

If you wanted to console me after my hfsc confusions, you did it!

Thanks again,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html