[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090603144031.2945f24d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:40:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, aviad.yehezkel5@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13443] New: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in
IPV6 should be node local
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:06:29 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13443
>
> Summary: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node
> local
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.27
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV6
> AssignedTo: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
> ReportedBy: aviad.yehezkel5@...il.com
> Regression: No
>
>
> I think scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local (according
> to all the documentation + rfc I found on the web) and therefore pkt's with
> such destination address should not go on the wire.
> When I try to send a udp pkt with sock_dgram to such ipv6 address with scope 1
> I see the pkt is going on the wire and I can catch it on the other side by
> joining this multicast address.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists