| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090604104741.GA7471@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:47:41 -0400 From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> To: Andrew Grover <andy.grover@...il.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...hat.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:44:22PM -0700, Andrew Grover wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote: > > Not to throw more questions into the mix again, but didn't Ingo write a > > batching syscall a while back, which let you issue several syscalls in one trap > > to kernel space? I understand that your approach has some efficiency gains over > > that, but did that ever get accepted upstream? Is the overlap there sufficient > > to make this approach redundant? Or are the gains in performance here > > sufficient to warrant this new call? > > I couldn't find this via Google or any posts to LKML by Ingo on this? > > I'm very interested in multiple send/recvmsg support. So, it's > definitely going to happen? :-) > > Regards -- Andy > Its entirely possible it was just something he talked about on IRC, I just brought it up because of the overlap. Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists