[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090608.142927.122160930.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: rdreier@...co.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, yosefe@...taire.COM
Subject: Re: IPoIB: Fix multicast packet drops before join is complete
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:20:31 -0400 (EDT)
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, David Miller wrote:
>
>> It's fundamentally wrong. You need some limit there.
>
> Maybe we need a different approach but (since we are at the point of
> talking about categorical fundamentally wrong statements) its
> fundamentally wrong if the IPoIB layer works differently from a regular
> Ethernet NIC. They should work in the same way.
This I agree on. When a multicast group is joined, the IPoIB layer
should block in some way until the subscription is fully available
for use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists