[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090608162227.GE6961@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:22:27 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de,
oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de, wg@...ndegger.com,
vladislav.yasevich@...com, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sctp: protocol.c call rcu_barrier() on unload.
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:11:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On module unload call rcu_barrier(), this is needed as synchronize_rcu()
> is not strong enough. The kmem_cache_destroy() does invoke
> synchronize_rcu() but it does not provide same protection.
Good, looks like sctp_v4_del_protocol() invokes call_rcu(), which the
rcu_barrier() would then wait for. And it looks like sctp_v6_del_protocol()
does the same for IPv6.
Reviewed_by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
> ---
>
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index cb2c50d..79cbd47 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -1370,6 +1370,8 @@ SCTP_STATIC __exit void sctp_exit(void)
> sctp_proc_exit();
> cleanup_sctp_mibs();
>
> + rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
> +
> kmem_cache_destroy(sctp_chunk_cachep);
> kmem_cache_destroy(sctp_bucket_cachep);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists