[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2E6BA4.30002@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:03:16 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Antonio Almeida <vexwek@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Devera <devik@....cz>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@...ncoudi.com>,
Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 1/2] tc_core: Use double in tc_core_time2tick()
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Change 'time' parameters of tc_core_time2tick() and tc_core_time2big()
> from unsigned to double. It is especially needed to use in
> tc_calc_rtable() for kernels with increased psched ticks resolution,
> but even without this, it looks reasonable to avoid rounding here.
I would prefer to keep using integers, which are a lot easier to
analyze for rounding errors and overflows, besides having constant
granularity.
> -unsigned tc_core_time2tick(unsigned time)
> +unsigned tc_core_time2tick(double time)
> {
> - return time*tick_in_usec;
> + return time * tick_in_usec + 0.5;
ceil()?
> }
It seems inconsistent to have the time2tick() function take a
double, but return an unsigned from tick2time(). If we're going
to change this, please keep them symetrical (you could even use
floor() in tick2time() to make it more explicit).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists