netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter: Use pr_<level> and pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244742299.30185.7.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:44:59 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter: Use pr_<level> and pr_fmt

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:04 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2009-06-11 09:40, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> >Many of the [wretched grammar removed] netfilter printk
> >calls do not have KERN_<level> prefixes.
[]
> >Remove the function names in printk strings and add
> >#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s:%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__
> 
> Hm I had wished there was a better way than to replicate
> this define over all Netfilter files.
> Perhaps stuff it into an include.

Maybe standardize the netfilter includes a bit later?

Patrick, is this patch set concept acceptable at all?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html