[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090611.205906.215886308.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: timo.teras@....fi
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_ARPD help text
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:28:21 +0300
> I just re-read again the CONFIG_ARPD help text. It says it's
> "experimental and also obsolete".
>
> But as opennhrp relies on this, and has shown the usefulness for
> this interface - it can be used to implement other protocols that
> resolve neighbor address than ARP in userland. In this case the
> NHRP protocol.
>
> Would it be acceptable to remove the designation as "obsolete"?
>
> Also, I'm running the opennhrp on production with reasonable
> size network (100+ nodes in gre subnet). And with the fix I sent
> previously it seems to work very stable. Is there something more
> to be done, or could the "experimental" marking be removed also?
>
> I could also update the help to explain where the option is useful.
> Or should the option be renamed to something like NEIGH_NETLINK?
> It also seems that IPv6 supports CONFIG_ARPD so it should probably
> be moved from net/ipv4/Kconfig to likely net/core/Kconfig?
I think it's rediculious to have these tags on something that's
been in active, useful, use for years. Feel free to remove them
and to expand the help text.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists