lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:44:18 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> To: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl> Cc: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:09:57PM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote: > > Jarek Poplawski pisze: > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, jamal wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:19 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>> This is only a sample but is not working > >>>>> > >>> It does seem to be working! > >>> How did you reach conclusion it wasnt working? > >>> > >>> > >>>>> Action statistics: > >>>>> Sent 42351 bytes 110 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 32 requeues 0) > >>>>> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > >>>>> > >>> 32 packets hit the policer - double check your parameters please to make > >>> sure they are correct. > >>> > >> > >> > > Yes. packets hits policer but second action dont drop packets. > > I guess Jamal meant 'hit the policer' == 'dropped' (and 110 - 32 > passed). So the question is how did you checked it's otherwise. Hmm... Not that we don't believe you, but some other (tc -s qdisc ?) stats with this would be appreciated before checking the code.;-) Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists