netdev - Re: Any implementation of NETPOLL for bonding?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090615230907.GA8515@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:09:07 -0400
From:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	Paul Smith <paul@...-scientist.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Any implementation of NETPOLL for bonding?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 05:26:02PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I wanted to attach to my kernel with KGDBOE but failed because the
> bonding driver doesn't support NETPOLL, and the only network access to
> the system is over a bonded interface.
> 
> This is a big bummer for me :-).
> 

I did some work in the not-too-distant past on this and can probably
dig-up the patches and port them to the latest upstream.  Would you be
able to test a patch?

> Is there any possibility of NETPOLL being supported in the bonding
> driver?  I found a very old patch set from Jeff Moyer (circa 2005)
> adding NETPOLL support to the bonding driver but as far as I can
> determine it's not present in current kernels.
> 

It's a bit unclear to me why Jeff's patches were never accepted, but I
suspect if there were many that didn't like them before, they won't be
well received now, but it sure would be nice to use kgdb and use
netconsole on bonding interfaces, wouldn't it? :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html