[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245180000.7150.6.camel@Maple>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:20:00 +0000
From: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <ben.lahaise@...erion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lots of cpu time spent in skb_copy_bits() in net-next with
small mtu
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 22:57 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up: something in net-next is resulting in lots of cpu time
> > being spent in skb_copy_bits() (called from tcp_collapse()) when an ethernet
> > interface mtu is lowered to 576 on the source and dest machines running
> > netperf. This behaviour does not appear in 2.6.29. I'll try to bisect
> > it this weekend.
>
> I'd suggest somebody goes through DaveM's abstraction patch 915219441d56
> (I'm totally out of time so somebody else has to do it if a timely
> solution is desired)... It was quite messy on those parts and I already
> found one issue from it (2df9001edc3) and wouldn't be too surprised if
> there would be some more lurking around...
I couldn't find anything wrong with tcp_prune_queue() and its helpers as
they appear in today's net-next.
Take that with a grain of salt if you wish--I'm going to go take a
couple grains of aspirin.
-- John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists