[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A37F34F.5010404@grupopie.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:32:31 +0100
From: Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: mb@...sch.de, dave@...dillows.org, michael.riepe@...glemail.com,
romieu@...zoreil.com, m.bueker@...lin.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>> From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
>> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:22:23 +0200
>>
>>
>>> I didn't notice a CC:stable.
>>> I think this should also go to stable.
>>> Does somebody take care?
>>>
>> I'll queue it up.
>>
>
> Actually, this patch doesn't even remotely come close to applying
> to 2.6.29.4
>
> So if someone wants this in -stable, they need to respin this against
> that tree and (if wanted) 2.6.27.x -stable as well.
>
Hi David,
Here is a patch for the 2.6.27.25 kernel. Could you please queue it up
to the -stable tree ?
With this patch applied I got no more problems on this XID 24a00000 chip.
Also, for this chip to work I also had to apply this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9389523a77be0a7e01d957c836733b5c9d5530a1
( with a few changes )
This patch was the first to be committed after the release of 2.6.27 and
it only seems to add support for a few extra NICs.
Thanks a lot for you initial patch.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Rui Santos
View attachment "msi-r8169-2.6.27.25.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3903 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists