netdev - Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions: play with netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245276899.31588.57.camel@johannes.local>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:14:59 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions: play with netns

On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 13:46 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> 
> > This makes wireless extensions netns aware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> > ---
> > Is this ok, or is this racy? I guess what I'm asking is -- will
> > for_each_net() stop iterating over a netns that is going away before the
> > pernet exit op is called? If yes, this should be fine.
> 
> for_each_net requires the rtnl_lock or the net_mutex to be safe.
> You aren't taking either so your code is racy.

So it looks like I can also use rcu_read_lock(), but there's no
for_each_net_rcu(), should there be?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)