[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1my86qt73.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:30:40 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions: play with netns
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:54 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> > Subject: net: make namespace iteration possible under RCU
>> >
>> > We already call rcu_barrier(), so all we need to take
>> > care of is using proper RCU list add/del primitives.
>>
>> This of course gives you a network namespace that can be found by for_each_net rcu
>> while the per net exit functions are running. I think that opens up to races
>> that I don't want to think about.
>
> Indeed. Can we move the rcu_barrier() up? Or we could insert a
> synchronize_rcu() (which is sufficient for rcu_read_lock) before the
> exit functions are run?
I don't think we can move the barrier. But adding an extra synchronize_rcu
should be fine. We are talking about the slowest of the slow paths here.
It is so slow it even gets it's own kernel thread.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists