netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: make namespace iteration possible under RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090618114516.GA6107@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:45:16 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: make namespace iteration possible under RCU

Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:08:23PM CEST, johannes@...solutions.net wrote:
>All we need to take care of is using proper RCU list
>add/del primitives and inserting a synchronize_rcu()
>at one place to make sure the exit notifiers are run
>after everybody has stopped iterating the list.
>
>Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
>---
> include/net/net_namespace.h |    3 +++
> net/core/net_namespace.c    |   10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>--- wireless-testing.orig/include/net/net_namespace.h	2009-06-18 01:36:26.000000000 +0200
>+++ wireless-testing/include/net/net_namespace.h	2009-06-18 02:17:14.000000000 +0200
>@@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ static inline struct net *read_pnet(stru
> #define for_each_net(VAR)				\
> 	list_for_each_entry(VAR, &net_namespace_list, list)
> 
>+#define for_each_net_rcu(VAR)				\
>+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(VAR, &net_namespace_list, list)
>+
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> #define __net_init
> #define __net_exit
>--- wireless-testing.orig/net/core/net_namespace.c	2009-06-18 01:36:39.000000000 +0200
>+++ wireless-testing/net/core/net_namespace.c	2009-06-18 02:03:06.000000000 +0200
>@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
>+#include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
> #include <net/netns/generic.h>
> 
>@@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long fl
> 	err = setup_net(new_net);
> 	if (!err) {
> 		rtnl_lock();
>-		list_add_tail(&new_net->list, &net_namespace_list);
>+		list_add_tail_rcu(&new_net->list, &net_namespace_list);
> 		rtnl_unlock();
> 	}
> 	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
>@@ -163,9 +164,12 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_stru
> 
> 	/* Don't let anyone else find us. */
> 	rtnl_lock();
>-	list_del(&net->list);
>+	list_del_rcu(&net->list);
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 
>+	/* if somebody is rcu-iterating the list, wait */
>+	synchronize_rcu();

IMHO you do not need to call synchronize_rcu() here since rcu_barrier() is
called later just before net_free(net). Seems redundant.

	Jirka

>+
> 	/* Run all of the network namespace exit methods */
> 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
> 		if (ops->exit)
>@@ -227,7 +231,7 @@ static int __init net_ns_init(void)
> 	err = setup_net(&init_net);
> 
> 	rtnl_lock();
>-	list_add_tail(&init_net.list, &net_namespace_list);
>+	list_add_tail_rcu(&init_net.list, &net_namespace_list);
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 
> 	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html