[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906191928.28386.chunkeey@web.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:28:27 +0200
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@....de>
To: "linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.31] p54: band-aid to restore driver functionality
This patch is the trade-off between size vs. time vs. functionality.
Unfortunately, It reverts some portions of
"[PATCH 3/10]: p54: Use SKB list handling helpers instead of by-hand code."
as rewriting the mm code to only rely on the available helper functions
in include/linux/skbuff.h is beyond scope of -rcX patches.
in p54_assign_address:
target_skb is used as a mere "pointer" after which the next element
will be queued. It's perfectly _legal_ if this pointer points to
priv->tx_queue's head/tail.
Also ieee80211_stop_queue(s) must not be called during initialisation.
in p54_free_skb:
Nearly ;-)... Actually, the skb->prev || skb->next check was once very
useful for finding double frees in the back-end driver code.
However, it is dead code now and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@....de>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c 2009-06-19 17:02:53.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c 2009-06-19 18:17:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -823,14 +823,8 @@ void p54_free_skb(struct ieee80211_hw *d
struct p54_tx_info *range;
unsigned long flags;
- if (unlikely(!skb || !dev || skb_queue_empty(&priv->tx_queue)))
- return;
-
- /* There used to be a check here to see if the SKB was on the
- * TX queue or not. This can never happen because all SKBs we
- * see here successfully went through p54_assign_address()
- * which means the SKB is on the ->tx_queue.
- */
+ if (unlikely(!skb || WARN_ON(!dev)))
+ return ;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
@@ -1149,7 +1143,8 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct iee
* We have throttle normal data traffic, because we must
* have a few spare slots for control frames left.
*/
- ieee80211_stop_queues(dev);
+ if (likely(priv->mode != NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED))
+ ieee80211_stop_queues(dev);
queue_delayed_work(dev->workqueue, &priv->work,
msecs_to_jiffies(P54_TX_TIMEOUT));
@@ -1170,7 +1165,7 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct iee
range = (void *)info->rate_driver_data;
hole_size = range->start_addr - last_addr;
if (!target_skb && hole_size >= len) {
- target_skb = skb_queue_prev(&priv->tx_queue, entry);
+ target_skb = entry->prev;
hole_size -= len;
target_addr = last_addr;
}
@@ -1178,7 +1173,7 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct iee
last_addr = range->end_addr;
}
if (!target_skb && priv->rx_end - last_addr >= len) {
- target_skb = skb_peek_tail(&priv->tx_queue);
+ target_skb = priv->tx_queue.prev;
largest_hole = max(largest_hole, priv->rx_end - last_addr - len);
if (!skb_queue_empty(&priv->tx_queue)) {
info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(target_skb);
@@ -1190,7 +1185,8 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct iee
if (!target_skb) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
- ieee80211_stop_queues(dev);
+ if (likely(priv->mode != NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED))
+ ieee80211_stop_queues(dev);
return -ENOSPC;
}
@@ -1201,8 +1197,9 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct iee
__skb_queue_after(&priv->tx_queue, target_skb, skb);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
- if (largest_hole < priv->headroom + sizeof(struct p54_hdr) +
- 48 + IEEE80211_MAX_RTS_THRESHOLD + priv->tailroom)
+ if ((largest_hole < priv->headroom + sizeof(struct p54_hdr) +
+ 48 + IEEE80211_MAX_RTS_THRESHOLD + priv->tailroom) &&
+ (priv->mode != NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED))
ieee80211_stop_queues(dev);
data->req_id = cpu_to_le32(target_addr + priv->headroom);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists