[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090620.164748.227654288.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mbizon@...ebox.fr,
dada1@...mosbay.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix NULL pointer + success return in route lookup path
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:39:25 +0200
> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 06/20/2009 02:37 PM:
>
>> Neil Horman wrote, On 06/19/2009 07:18 PM:
>>
>>> Don't drop route if we're not caching
>
> ...
>
>>> route.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> index cd76b3c..65b3a8b 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> @@ -1085,8 +1085,16 @@ restart:
>>> now = jiffies;
>>>
>>> if (!rt_caching(dev_net(rt->u.dst.dev))) {
>>> - rt_drop(rt);
>
>
> One more question: if this rt is assigned to an skb, there is only
> skb_dst_drop() in kfree_skb(), but it seems we skip rt_free() part,
> or I miss something?
This whole code path was buggy, if it returns success it should
do as the normal success code path does which is assign for
non-SKB case to *rp, or skb_dst_set().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists